H.R. 3103 - Kassebaum/Kennedy
The provisions of the Group Health policy illustrated above, does not take into consideration much of the HIPAA legislation. At the time of this text construction, many companies had not effected many of the required changes, and there were questions that had not been answered by the Federal Government. Therefore, provisions as such are not presented in this text, but a review of the Act will demonstrate the changes and additions in benefits as the result of this legislation.
In addition to the effects on Group Insurance, the legislation also addresses portability of individual policies, the introduction of Medical Savings Accounts (MSA), Medicare and Medicaid Fraud, and Administrative simplification of health insurance products. For this purposes of this discussion, references will be made to the role of individual insurance and MSA’s (which are individual health insurance products) only.
The following is a summary of this Act’s provisions.
The purpose of this legislation is "to provide portability and continuity of health insurance coverage in the group and individual markets, to combat waste, fraud and abuse in health insurance and health care delivery, to promote the use of medical savings accounts, to improve access to long-term care services and coverage, to simplify the administration of health insurance."
Groups are defined as two or more participants (employees generally). The prime reason for the legislation is portability, which is achieved through limitation on pre-existing condition exclusions. Such limitations are applicable to all group plans and are defined as follows:
An insurer providing individual coverage in a state cannot deny coverage to an individual coming off of group coverage. Such an individual, however, must:
a) have had previous coverage for at least 18 months;
b) not be eligible for other group coverage;
c) not have been terminated from previous coverage due to non-payment of premiums, fraud,
etc.; and
d) not be eligible for or have exhausted, COBRA coverage.
An individual insurer is not required to guarantee issue more than two policies. Those two policies can either be the insurer's two most popular plans, based on premium volume, or a package of lower level and higher level coverage plans based on premium volume, or a package of lower level and higher level cover-age plans based on an actuarial average. The latter plans must be covered under a risk adjustment or risk-spreading mechanism.
The guaranteed issue requirement would not apply in a state that has instituted an approved alternative mechanism to provide group-to-individual coverage. Such a mechanism can be, but is not limited to, a risk pool, mandatory group conversion policies, guaranteed issue of one or more individual plans, open enrollment by one or more insurers, or a combination of these or other mechanisms.
The alternative mechanism option can be automatically met through adoption of NAIC models covering high-risk pools, small employers, and/or individual health coverage.
A state will be presumed to have in place an acceptable alternative mechanism as of the July 1, 1997 implementation date H.R. 3103 if the governor notifies the Secretary of Health and Human Services of intent to do so, even though the actual mechanism may not be enacted until January 1, 1998. In other words, there is a grace period that will allow the state additional time for enactment without the guaranteed issue requirement becoming effective.
All individual policies, not just the group-to-individual policies, must be renewed (guaranteed renewability), with the exceptions applicable for group coverage also applicable here.
Effective Date: 7-1-97. Based on date of service, for all fully insured groups in all market segments, and HMOs.
Provisions:
(Following not applicable to individual policies)
Provisions:
Allows for the reduction of the pre-existing condition exclusion period by the creditable coverage under a prior health insurance plan if there was no break in coverage of more than 62 days.
Provisions: (Note: The group may elect to furnish the certificates themselves provided they sign a waiver with their carrier).
Health insurers are required to furnish a certificate of creditable coverage to an individual as follows:
Provisions:
Provisions:
Provisions:
A demonstration program testing the viability of medical savings accounts is provided. Under the program, contributions to an MSA, as well as the interest earned, are tax deductible, but only if a catastrophic health insurance policy is also purchased. The key components and parameters of the demonstration program area as follows:
Those eligible are the self-employed, employers with 50 or fewer employees and their employees (however, if a company expands to up to 200 employees, the company's work force would still be eligible), and those without insurance.
Initial eligibility for MSAs under the demonstration program begins January 1, 1997. A cap of 750,000 is placed on the number of MSA policies or plans that can participate, though the actual number of people covered could be twice that amount or more, depending on the amount of family coverage. In addition, those without insurance coverage or access to coverage through the employer for at least six months would not be counted under the cap, but could not obtain MSAs once the cap is reached.
Catastrophic policies accompanying the savings accounts must have deductibles in the range of $1500 to $2250 for individuals, and $3000 to $4500 for families. In addition, out-of-pocket expenses could not exceed $3000 for individuals and $5500 for families. The policies are typical Major Medical individual insurance policies.
Annual contributions to the MSA will be limited to 65% of the deductible for individuals and 75% for families.
A 15% penalty would be applied to all funds withdrawn from the savings account and used for non-medical purposes. through age 65, except in cases of death or disability.
Those participating in the demonstration will be able to keep their MSAs after the four-year period runs out, but for coverage to extend to the rest of the population, Congress would have to vote to do so.
Health insurance deductions for the self-employed currently stand at 30%. They will be increased as follows:
1997 - 40%
1998 - 45%
2003 - 50%
2004 - 60%
2005 - 70%
2006 - 80%
C.A.
Mike’s decision to leave the employ of Consolidated and acquire his own health insurance, and the effects of HIPAA are illustrated in the C.A. previously. In addition, there are other provisions of interest to Mike.
Now that Mike is self employed and in good health, he may elect to participate in a Medical Savings Account. He would purchase”catastrophe” coverage, defined as a Major Medical Insurance policy with a deductible of $1500 to $2250, or combined family deductible of $3000 to $4500. (New proposed legislation will reduce the deductible to $1,000 and combined accordingly). He would set aside 65% of the individual deductible or 75% of the deductible for the family coverage, into a Medical Savings Account. Funds in the MSA that are not used for medical purposes may accumulate tax-free.
In addition, he can deduct 45% of his insurance premium from his taxes as business expense.
(Included as Title VII of the VA-HUD Appropriations Bill)
Please refer to provisions regarding group health insurance coverage of mental health above. For groups of 50 or more employees, the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 was enacted. Many of the large group policies will have Endorsements reflecting this legislation, or will have it as part of their Mental Health Care provisions. Following is a Summary of Final Provisions
C.A.
Consolidated’s health insurance plan has a limitation on Mental Health benefits (as indicated in prior text). Since their health insurance plan was in force prior to January 1, 1998, this Endorsement would not apply to their plan. However, if they change plans, the new plans must allow Mental Health benefits to be treated the same as any other benefit under the plan, with the exception of alcohol and drug rehabilitation in most jurisdictions.
If, however, by adding this provision to a new health insurance plan, the premium would increase by more than one percent (and it can be actuarially proven), they could resort back to an annual cap.
Another Federal Act was enacted in 1996 as a political response to highly publicized early discharges of mothers of newborn children. Signed into law on September 26, 1996, NMHPA provides new protection for mothers and their newborn children with regards to the length of hospital stays following the birth of the child.
This legislation prohibits any insurer/HMO from:
These amendments do not require a mother who is a participant or beneficiary to give birth in a hospital or stay in a hospital for a fixed period of time following the birth of her infant.
STUDY QUESTIONS
1. The primary purpose of the HIPAA legislation is
2. Under HIPAA, time accrued under the pre-existing condition exclusion must be carried from one plan to another
3.The same pre-existing condition exclusion provision applicable in the group market are
applicable in the individual market,
4. An insurer cannot deny coverages to an individual coming off of group coverage, however
5. Under HIPAA, Pregnancy and treatment related to domestic violence
6. Under the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996, if a group health insurance policy does not have lifetime or annual limits on benefits for mental health,
7. The “Newborns’ and Mothers’ Health Protection Act” provides new protection for mothers and their newborn children with regards to
A. Medicare.
B. length of hospital stay.
C. choice of doctors.
D. payment of hospital bills.
8. The Mental Health Parity Act of 1996
A. was passed because of the deterioration of the mental health of insurance agents.
B. can be sold as a stand alone individual policy.
C. requires certain benefits to be included in the plan.
D. applies to groups of fifty or more employees.
9. In respect to the Newborn’s and Mother’s Health Protection Act of 1996, which of the following is a true statement:
A. This law required that a mother must spend at least 3 days in the hospital following birth.
B. An HMO may offer a primary care physician a bonus for each new mother that leaves the hospital within 1 day of birth.
C. An insurer may not offer rebates to a mother to encourage her to accept less than the minimum protections available under this law.
D. The NMHPA only affects the length of time that a newborn will stay in the hospital.
10. Under a Medical Savings Account (MSA) contributions to an MSA
A. are tax deductible, but not the interest earned.
B. and interest earned are tax deductible, provided the individual has purchased a catastrophic health insurance policy.
C. are tax deductible, but only in group situations of 25 or more employees.
D. are non-taxable.
ANSWERS TO STUDY QUESTIONS
1A 2C 3C 4B 5A 6B 7B 8D 9C 10B