Variable Universal Life (VUL) is discussed in a little more detail than other types of policies because it is the most versatile of the life insurance products and is very popular and more closely resembles Indexed Universal Life. VUL is a policy that has the premium flexibility and policy adjustment features of Universal Life with the investment options of variable life, which helps to explain why this policy is so popular.
From the viewpoint of a “contract,” a VUL policy is Universal Life as flexible premiums, death benefit options (A and B) and the other standard provisions of a UL policy are present in a VUL policy. There is really only one big difference, and that is that of the variable nature of the account value of the policy. UL account values are gathered in the insurance company’s general account and then credited with a guaranteed rate of return, or a higher value if justified by the interest rates of the insurer. VUL policyowners can place their cash value in any of a wide variety of separate accounts or subaccounts – including a fixed interest guarantee from the company’s general account. (At this point there would be no difference between a VUL and a UL policy, except that they could later change the investment option to a separate account.) The accounting for the separate account unit value is the same as with variable life.
Even though the features and the benefits are the same as with UL policies, with the flexibility of VLI in premiums, since it is now a “mixture” of the two policies, various features and benefits should be considered. And, as with any whole life plan, VUL policies provide lifetime insurance protection.
While most of the standard provisions of the VUL are the same as those of other life insurance policies, there are three provisions that differ, two that are unique to VUL, and certain riders are available.
Since the VUL is an “unbundled” policy, there really is no connection between the payment of the premium and the continuation of the coverage, but whether the policy continues is a function of the cash value. If the cash value is insufficient to maintain the cost of insurance, the policyowner will be so notified that a premium must be paid. From that date – date of notification – the required premium to keep the policy in force must be paid within 61 days or the policy will lapse. Full coverage remains in force during the 61 days.
If a VUL policy should lapse, it may be reinstated at any time within a stated period of time (usually 2 years), subject to specified requirements and conditions:
As required by law, after the policy is issued, the policyowner has a stipulated period of time (usually 10 days after receipt of the policy by the policyowner, or 45 days after the application has been signed) to return the policy to the insurer and receive a full refund of all premiums paid, no questions asked. In some states, the refund will reflect earnings or losses in the cash value accounts, due to investment(s) performance, for the period of time that the money was in the control of the insurer.
Unique to VUL policies, the VUL allows policyowners to exchange the VUL for a comparable non-variable plan, or they may transfer all values in the subaccounts of the VUL to the general and fixed account within 24 months after issue of the VUL. The new policy, if the VUL is exchanged, will have the same effective date, same issue age and the same underwriting classification as the VUL.
At the time the policy is issued, it is impossible to project what the cash values will actually be because of the fluctuations of the investment accounts. The SEC also requires “full-disclosure,” so for these reasons, the policyowner is sent an annual report that explains the current status of the policy, in full detail. The annual report will contain the following information:
Semiannual reports are also sent to the policyowner, which show the 6-month performance of the cash value accounts in which the funds of the policyowner has invested, and a complete listing of all investments in the policy.
The same options that are available for Universal Life and some traditional products are generally available for VUL policies. Following is a list of those that may be included:
Congress enacted the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, commonly referred to as “TAMRA,” and which revised the definition of a “life insurance contract” for tax purposes. One of the principal purposes of this act was to discourage the sale and purchase of life insurance for investment purposes or as a tax shelter, and by doing so, they created a new class of insurance, known as modified endowment contracts or MECs.
Life insurance has traditionally had a very favorable tax treatment, but if the policies do not meet the qualifications set forth in TAMRA, then the policyowners will not receive this favorable tax treatment.
Basically, if the policyowner makes a loan or withdrawal from the policy, the amount that is loaned or withdrawn will be taxed first as ordinary income and then as return of premium – if there is a gain of more than premiums paid. In addition, there is a 10% penalty tax imposed on this amount if the policyowner is less than 59 ½ years old.
So as not to be classified as an MEC, the policy must meet the “7-pay test” (discussed in detail later). Briefly, this states that if the total amount paid into a life insurance contract by the policyowner during its early years, exceeds the sum of the net level premiums that would have been payable to provide paid-up future benefits in seven years, then the policy is an MEC – and it can be an MEC at any time during the first 7 years – and it will remain an MEC during the duration of the policy.
Sound complicated? It is! Therefore, the determination as to whether a policy is an MEC is the responsibility of the insurance company and its actuaries.
The potential for abuse or misuse particularly exists with single- pay life insurance policies, limited pay policies and Universal Life policies, especially since many consumers purchase these policies for tax benefits instead of protection. Therefore, insurance companies and their producers must be aware of this law and its implications.
Even though the modified endowment contract loses some of the tax advantages of a life insurance policy, it still retains the death benefit and in certain situations, this can be worked to the policyowners advantage.
If the problem for the policyowner is Estate planning, a VUL MEC can be used to an advantage as the policyowner can pay one (or several) large (usually very large) premiums and then later contribute more premiums should the policyowner find it helpful or if the need should arise. The policy still has the security-based growth, and when the policyowner dies, the funds go directly to the beneficiaries without going through probate of the IRS first. The VUL becomes a valuable planning tool!
However, no one should ever recommend such a plan without discussing the tax consequences to the prospect and if there is the slightest indication that the prospect does not completely understand the situation, then it is imperative that they consult a tax professional.
F The separate accounts within a VUL policy builds cash value within a life insurance policy, therefore a VUL receives the same favorable tax treatment as other cash value life insurance policies.
Even though it is regulated as a Security, it still retains its originality as a life insurance policy for taxation purposes.
Obviously, premiums are not tax deductible. Cash values accumulate free of current income taxes (but the legal guideline corridor ratio between cash value and death benefit must be maintained within the policy).
Death benefit proceeds are tax-free, and lump-sum benefits paid to a beneficiary are excluded from the beneficiary’s gross income for tax purposes.
Policy loans are viewed as a debt of the policyowner, and not as income or a taxable distribution. Interest paid on a loan (for non-business purposes) is not tax deductible. Also, if a policy fails the “7-pay test” it then becomes an “MEC” and loans and withdrawals are then subject to current income taxes plus a 10% penalty if the policyowner is under age 59 ½. (See discussions of modified endowment contracts, MECs.)
In some cases, surrenders and withdrawals and the right to change death benefits options, can have tax consequences. For instance, upon total surrender, any amount received by the policyowner that is in excess of the total premiums paid into the policy, is treated as ordinary income and is taxed as such.
In total, taxation of the VUL has created a very appealing product to many persons, particularly those who are in a higher tax bracket. As an example, individual life insurance doubled from 1986 to 1996, but over the same period of time, variable life insurance (including VUL) grew from approximately $65 billion, to $591 billion.
In order for a VUL policy to meet the definition of an insurance contract and obtain the favorable tax treatment, there are three tests that must be met:
When the cash value of a permanent life insurance policy exceeds the single premium that would pay for all future benefits, at that point the policy no longer meets the IRS definition of life insurance. If a policy does not meet this cash value accumulation test, the policy is “disqualified,” with the disqualification retroactive to the policy issue date. All income credited to that policy becomes taxable to the policyowner.
Since the insured or the insurance company’s producers do not have access to the mortality tables and the present value tables necessary to make this “test,” the insurance company’s home office will provide the necessary expertise to make sure that the policy meets the test and is considered as life insurance.
All VUL contracts contain a provision that defines the minimum of pure insurance protection in comparison to the cash value amount. This minimum amount, technically guideline minimum sum insured, is the amount that is necessary to prevent the policy from violating the IRS Corridor rules.
To further make this complicated, the IRS considers the minimum sum insured by using a published ratio between the face amount of the policy and its cash value. (See table below) For example, for those under age 40, the death benefit must be 250 percent as great as the cash value at that age. The ratio decreases each year, eventually reaching 100 percent around age 95, at which time it is said to “mature.”
In the previous discussion of Universal Life, the illustrations show how the face amount increases after the cash value grows to a certain point, and after that point, the “amount at risk” continues to grow, with the “corridor” between the cash value and the death benefit. The reason for the corridor is that if a policy matures before age 95, under the IRS Code it is no longer considered as life insurance. So, in order to maintain this ratio, insurance companies reserve the right to refuse additional payments of premium if they would cause the cash value to increase beyond the upper limits relative to the death benefit. If the policy fails to meet the corridor test in any year, the policy is disqualified from inception and all income credited to that policy becomes taxable income to the policyowner.
Another test! However, if a policy fails the 7-pay test, it still remains as a life insurance policy, even though it loses the tax advantages of policy loans and withdrawals. This has been mentioned previously, during the discussion of MECs.
Basically, the test considers that if the total amount a policyowner pays into a life insurance policy during its first years, exceeds the sum of the net level premiums that would have been payable to provide paid-up future benefits in 7 years, then the policy is a MEC. Once a policy is an MEC, it will always be an MEC. And, to repeat the earlier discussion of MECs, if the policyowner receives any amount from a loan or withdrawal, that amount is taxed first as ordinary income, then as return of premium. Plus the 10% penalty if the policyowner is under age 59 ½.
One other point on taxation of VULs. If interest accrues after a date of death because of a delay in settlement, the interest may be taxable. If the interest-only settlement option is chosen, the tax exclusion does not apply, and it does not apply to any option selected by the beneficiary.
Ratio of Face Amount to Cash Value in order to meet the Corridor Test
Age Percentage Age Percentage
Through 40 250% 60 130%
41 243% 61 128%
42 236% 62 126%
43 229% 63 124%
44 222% 64 122%
45 215% 65 120%
46 209% 66 119%
47 203% 67 118%
48 197% 68 117%
49 191% 69 116%
50 185% 70 115%
51 178% 71 113%
52 171% 72 111%
53 164% 73 109%
54 157% 74 107%
55 150% 75 thru 90 105%
56 146% 91 104%
57 142% 92 103%
58 138% 93 102%
59 134% 94 101%
95 100%
An outline of the NASD Conduct Rules were indicated earlier. At this point, it would be advantageous to discuss some of those rules in a little more detail as they are very important to the marketing of Variable Universal Life.
Because the variable products are rather complex and the outcomes are not readily and accurately forecast without considerable explanation and assumptions, it is extremely difficult to describe to the average consumer exactly how a VUL functions. However, the life insurance industry has a checkered past in using illustrations as a sales tool, so the insurer’s representative or agent must be extremely careful and must always tell the prospect that all illustrations are hypothetical and based on assumptions, and are certainly not a guarantee of cash value accumulations. A statement to the effect that the prospect understands that the illustrations are not guarantees, etc., are required to be signed by the prospect by some insurers as a precaution.
Illustrations may use any combination of returns up to a maximum gross rate of 12 percent, but only if the present market conditions warrant such expectations and an illustration with a “0” return is also provided. The major difficulty suffered by insurers today with existing blocks of Universal and other interest-sensitive life products is that the interest rates have declined recently, to levels beyond the comprehension of most people just a few years ago. Many illustrations were shown with a return of a level 10% interest rate.
All illustrations must show that separate account returns are what determines the cash values as well as the death benefits, and they must show maximum mortality and expense charges.
It is NOT appropriate to compare one policy to another based on hypothetical performances. Further, a hypothetical illustration can only show the relationship between the cash value and the death benefit value, not whether it is “better” than another policy. Illustrations comparing VUL to the “buy term and invest the difference” strategy is considered as appropriate, provided that the hypothetical returns are identical and other such stipulations are met.
Variable contracts have special rules as part of the NASD rules and they apply mostly to the construction of the policy and not specifically to agent’s conduct.
Obviously, when the values of a contract can change daily, it is necessary that the value must be determined at a specific time, in this case when the payments have been received - they are considered to have been received when the application has been received. This further emphasizes that all applications and premiums must be submitted to the insurance company’s home office promptly.
“Suitability” under the NASD Rules is a difficult prerequisite because of the changing economic climate in the U.S. VUL can be “used” in many different ways and all the ways that it can be used, whether “suitable” or not for a particular situation, is beyond the scope of this text. A few of the uses for VUL are addressed below:
VUL is an important vehicle for those who use insurance to build or transfer their estates. Life insurance is the best vehicle for transferring wealth with fewer hurdles, and the VUL product allows them to transfer their business interests to family members or to business partners
Variable Universal Life has a variety of attractive features to consumers, but probably the most attractive feature is that of flexibility. As any good financial planner can attest, few financial plans continue in a “straight line,” but fluctuate as circumstances change as they always do. VUL gives the policyowner the ability to fluctuate or remain static, depending upon the situation.
VUL is also noteworthy because of its ability to compensate for financial difficulties, as the policyowner can skip or reduce premiums if things get “tight” financially, and there would be (usually) funds that would be available in case of an emergency.
Policyowners not only control the amount and frequency of premium payments, but they also determine how the net premiums and cash values will be invested.
Americans are becoming more and more sophisticated investors and appreciate the value of professional fund management. This professional fund management of the separate accounts is a very attractive feature, particularly if the individual has suffered through a period of making wrong choices in investments without professional guidance.
When the overall financial and economic conditions change – as they have in early 2001 – the separate accounts can change to meet these changes as the policyowners will make their investment choices based upon their personal and present objectives and the current performance of the fund(s) that they choose, with the knowledge that they can change funds as the situation changes and can adjust to economic swings.
CONSUMER APPLICATION
Bill and Tracy are in their 20’s, with 2 young children and Tracy is staying home until the children are older, and then will return to her old job. At this time, finances are “tight” with Bill working as much overtime as possible. During this period of time, the need for life insurance is because if something should happen to Bill, Tracy would be left with the 2 children to raise. The VUL policy can meet that objective.
When Bill and Tracy enter their 30’s, Tracy returns to work, however they have since purchased a home so their financial needs are greater, and in addition, the costs of a college education continues to rise so they must start preparing for those expenses. The VUL policy will allow them to do both – increase the death benefit and at the same time, increase the cash value of the policy in anticipation of future expenses.
While the increase in cash value helped the children get into college by paying initial tuition, etc., since both children will be in college at the same time, they will need funds and the discretionary income of Bill and Tracy is reduced drastically. Therefore, they reduce their premium payments during the college period.
Now that they are both in their 40’s, the children have graduated and are on their own, they are both doing well in their jobs, and they start thinking seriously about retirement. Their financial goals are changing so the death benefit of the VUL is not as important. Assuming their incomes rise and there are no layoffs or other financial setbacks, they will be able to pay higher premiums to generate higher cash values in anticipation of retirement.
However, if during this period of time, there should be a financial setback, such as a job layoff because of a terrorist attach on the World Trade Center which created temporary economic problems (Bill works for an airlines), the VUL policy can be kept active and the premiums can be reduced as long as is financially needed.
STUDY QUESTIONS
1. The only real difference between Universal Life and Variable Universal Life is
A. the marketability of the name.
B. UL policies are sold by securities licensed agents, VUL is sold by insurance agents.
C. the variable nature of the account value.
D. there is no commission paid on Variable Universal Life.
2. While most of the provisions of the VUL and other life insurance policy's standard provisions are the same, one area where they differ is
A. in the suicide clause.
B. VUL is not medically underwritten, so all references to acceptability are absent.
C. the grace period as there is no connection between the payment of the premium and the continuation of the coverage in the VUL.
D. in the "Entire Contract" provision.
3. With a Modified Endowment Contract, if the policyholder makes a loan or withdrawal from the policy, the amount that is loaned or withdrawn
A. will be taxed first as ordinary income and then as return of premium.
B. will be taxed as ordinary income in its entirety.
C. will be taxed, but at Capital gains rates.
D. should never be taxed under any situation.
4. Since the separate accounts within a VUL policy receives the same favorable tax treatment as other cash value life insurance policies because
A. it is expressly immune from taxation by federal law.
B. the premiums for the same coverage would be the same.
C. it is acknowledged as a securities device masquerading as an insurance policy.
D. the policy builds cash value within a life insurance policy.
5. In order for a VUL policy to meet the definition of an insurance contract and obtain the favorable tax treatment, there are three tests that must be met, one of which states
A. when the cash value of a permanent life insurance policy exceeds the single premium that would pay for all future benefits, at that point the policy does not meet the IRS definition of life insurance.
B. if the premium together with the cash value, equals more than the total of all funds invested in the plan, then it is only an annuity.
C. when the benefits afforded by the total of all premiums paid, equals or exceeds the death benefit, then it is not an insurance contract.
D. if the policy in any way offers a benefits at death or disability, then for this
purpose, it is not an insurance policy.
6. If a VUL policy fails the 7-pay test, it still remains as a life insurance policy
A. even though it loses the tax advantages of policy loans and withdrawals.
B. and it is considered a Modified Life Insurance Contract.
C. with all benefits afforded a life insurance policy.
D. but all benefits and all interest accruals will be taxed at Capital gains rates.
7. Illustrations may use any combination of returns up to a maximum gross rate of 12 percent,
A. regardless of market conditions.
B. if the illustration therefore proves what the agent wants it to prove.
C. but only if the present market conditions warrant such expectations and an
illustration with a “0” return is also provided.
D. which may be used for no more than 3 years total, and then the then market
conditions will dictate the percentage.
8. Since the values of a contract can change daily, it is necessary that the value must be determined at a specific time,
A. when the payments have been made and the application has been received.
B. at the date the application is received but no premiums are due until the policy
is issued.
C. which, by law, is midnight Greenwich Standard Time, a fortnight after the
premium has been paid.
D. which is determined to be when the underwriting has been completed.
9. NASD conduct rules state that products must be recommended only when the product suits the customer's needs. This is called
A. minimum coercion.
B. applicability.
C. suitability.
D. eventual losing the sale.
10. One of the most significant advantages of VUL policies is that it has the ability
A. to make the policyholder extremely rich.
B. to always have a pre-determined level face amount available at all times,
regardless.
C. to double the premium payment every seven years regardless of market forces.
D. to compensate for financial difficulties as the policyowner can skip or reduce premiums if he gets into a monetary pinch.
ANSWERS TO STUDY QUESTIONS
1C 2C 3A 4D 5A 6A 7C 8A 9C 10D